Company
ArizeFlow was written alongside working construction businesses — estimators, project managers, storekeepers — rather than designed for them from a distance.
Construction does not have a software problem. It has a reconciliation problem.
Most companies already own four tools. The cost of running them is not the licences — it is the week each month spent making their numbers agree.
0
Modules, all reading one project model
0
Roles, each scoped to what their work needs
0
Planning stages, from setup to Ready to Build
Six decisions the product keeps making.
These are not values on a wall. Each one shows up as a constraint somewhere in the schema.
A number is entered once
Every place a figure is retyped is a place two figures can disagree. Almost every architectural decision in the product follows from taking that seriously.
The database is the last line
Rules that matter are enforced where they cannot be bypassed — in the schema — not in the screen that happens to be rendering.
Software should meet the site
The person with the best information is standing in the sun with one free hand. If the tool does not work there, the data is already a week old.
Derived numbers are not stored
A stored copy of a computed figure is wrong the first time somebody edits the input. So we compute, and accept the cost.
History is not editable
An audit trail you can rewrite from inside the product answers no question worth asking.
Defaults should fail closed
A new user lands on the lowest privilege. A missing rule denies rather than permits. Nobody is quietly promoted by an oversight.
Bring your hardest project and your most sceptical estimator. That is the demo we prefer.
Build smarter.Execute faster.Deliver better.